Teaching

Case Centre resources

Our resources

Our resources thrust participants into the heart of real-world scenarios, from crisis management in the UK during the Covid-19 pandemic to cross-party education reform in Brazil.

Many of our resources are available on The Case Centre distribution platform. Educators who are registered with the site can access free review copies of our case studies, teaching notes, and other materials.

To inquire about our other cases or background materials, please contact us at casecentre@bsg.ox.ac.uk.

Filters
A group of women in colourful dresses in Sierra Leone

Fighting for women’s representation in Sierra Leone

For decades, Sierra Leone’s women’s movement had advocated for a quota for women in decision-making positions. But despite promises from successive governments to heed these calls, no quota had been implemented. By 2021, only 12% of parliamentarians were women. Minister of Gender and Children’s Affairs Manty Tarawalli was now attempting to pass a quota for women to boost representation. The bill had been part of her party's election manifesto yet faced resistance in parliament. How could Tarawalli find a majority?

In August 2021, Manty Tarawalli, Sierra Leone’s Minister of Gender and Children’s affairs, was trying to convince members of Sierra Leone’s hung parliament to vote for her ministry’s signature Gender Empowerment bill. The bill featured a 30% quota for women in parliament, public bodies, and private companies and had been received coldly by many representatives from Sierra Leone’s major parties.

The proposal followed decades of campaigning by Sierra Leone’s women’s movement, years of intense debate, and repeated promises by successive governments. But even though the bill was based on the government’s election manifesto, conversations with stakeholders, and a detailed policy paper, parliamentarians still asked her to conduct yet another round of national consultations. It was clear to her that the bill and the 30% quota were on the verge of being rejected: ‘Go out, go and do consultations. That is one way of derailing something’, Tarawalli remembered. As Tarawalli gathered herself, she had to consider her next steps. How could she overcome the resistance and usher the bill through parliament? Which negotiation strategies could she use to break the impasse?

Authors:
Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Analyse position of actors and power dynamics in multi-party negotiations;
  2. Understand the importance of mass mobilisation, alliances, and internal unity;
  3. Explore negotiation strategies and policy framing when pushed to the margins
More Info
Elderly woman looking at relatives over zoom

COMING SOON – Tackling adult social care in England

In autumn 2022, in the midst of economic turmoil, the UK government had to decide whether to follow through with a long-planned major reform of the crisis-shaken English adult social care sector or delay its implementation, hoping the government’s financial situation would stabilise. With budgets in dire straits, local councils called for a delay, while advocacy groups like Age UK urged immediate action, warning not to kick the decision into the long grass, like successive governments had before them.

Coming soon

In the autumn of 2022, the UK government faced critical decisions regarding adult social care reform in England. The adult social care sector was under severe strain, with record-high staff vacancies, financial instability among care providers, and growing demand for services. Meanwhile, the NHS was also stretched, with hospital discharges delayed due to limited social care capacity. A long-promised reform to cap lifetime care costs, based on the 2011 Dilnot Commission’s recommendations with an aim of preventing catastrophic care costs, was set to be implemented in 2023. But in November 2022, economic pressures – exacerbated by post-Covid-19 challenges and recent market instability – meant the Treasury was reassessing its £3.6 billion funding commitment for the policy reform amidst wider budget cuts. Local councils called for a delay given their difficult financial position, while advocacy groups like Age UK, which represented older people, urged immediate action, warning not to kick the decision into the long grass, like successive governments had before them. The Treasury, the office of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and the Department of Health and Social Care had to decide what to do.

Coming soon

Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Understand how England’s adult social care system is structured and funded, and diagnose areas that require reform;
  2. Consider different policy solutions and analyse their technical and political trade-offs;
  3. Identify barriers public leaders face in implementing and sustaining long-term reform
More Info
Official welcoming ceremony held by President of Mongolia Ukhnaagiin Khurelsukh for President of Russia Vladimir Putin

COMING SOON – An arresting decision: The politics of public international law and public policy in Mongolia

In October 2023, Mongolia needed to decide whether to invite Russian President Putin to a major state celebration after the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest. Legal uncertainty over head of state immunity intersected with Mongolia’s geopolitical reality as a democracy sandwiched between Russia and China. The decision risked either damaging Mongolia’s international standing or straining relations with a crucial economic partner. This case explores how legal obligations and political realities intersect to shape Mongolia’s foreign policy.

Coming soon

In October 2023, officials in Mongolia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs had to decide whether to invite Russia’s president Vladimir Putin to attend a major state celebration, which, in previous years, had served as an occasion for important diplomatic meetings. But in March 2023, the International Criminal Court (ICC) had issued a warrant for Putin’s arrest over alleged war crimes committed in Ukraine. The ICC expected its state parties, including Mongolia, to comply with the warrant. Yet some international law experts disagreed as to whether Mongolia had a duty or even the right to arrest Putin due to longstanding rules around the immunity of heads of state. For Mongolia, positioned between Russia and China and the region’s only democracy, these conflicting legal interpretations were joined by crucial policy implications.

Since leaving the Soviet Union in 1990, Mongolia had sought to balance its two neighbours’ influence and ensure independent survival orging ties with new, democratic partners. Inviting Putin and not complying with the arrest warrant could jeopardise Mongolia’s international standing. On the other hand, not inviting the president could threaten its crucial relationship with one of its two major economic partners.

Coming soon

Authors:
Length of Teaching:
1-2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Understand the relationship between law and policy, especially in a highly sensitive area;
  2. Distinguish the relationship between international and domestic policies and law and the roles played by international and domestic officials and bodies;
  3. Analyse the complex range of policy domains that a single decision can affect;
  4. Appreciate the role of personal values in public service.
More Info
Anti-government protest in Sri Lanka

COMING SOON – System change: realignment and political parties in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka’s 2024 presidential elections disrupted long‑standing political dynamics. Amid a deep political and economic crisis, frustration with the traditional elite fuelled support for a new coalition promising anti‑corruption reforms and systemic change. Yet the party needed to broaden its appeal in minority‑dominated areas ahead of parliamentary elections if it hoped to secure a mandate for its agenda. Could this moment transform Sri Lanka’s entrenched political and ethnic cleavages?

Coming soon

The 2024 presidential elections upended the traditional political status quo in Sri Lanka. As happened around the world that year, the incumbents were voted out and a new party – the National People’s Power (NPP) – secured the presidency. The elections came hot on the heels of a political and economic crisis in Sri Lanka. Facing massive nationwide protests, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa resigned and fled the country, bringing to an end years of Rajapaksa family influence. Yet, many Sri Lankans were also dissatisfied with the main opposition party. Instead, many turned to the NPP, which had only been established in 2019, and which had campaigned on an anti-corruption, anti-establishment platform, promising systemic reform.

However, the NPP performed relatively poorly in areas with large minority populations, particularly among Sri Lankan Tamils. As the parliamentary elections loomed, the NPP was seeking to attract a more diverse vote without alienating its base, hoping to secure enough of a majority to deliver constitutional change. In this case study and discussion, participants consider how social and political cleavages, especially those related to ethnicity, have structured politics in Sri Lanka and how political parties have related to, embedded, or reshaped this ethnic alignment.

Coming soon

Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Understand how political cleavages relate to social and ethnic cleavages within a society;
  2. Explore how political parties relate to, embed, or shape this alignment;
  3. Consider how political institutions can impact these political cleavages;
  4. Understand how different types of political parties – charismatic, clientelist, and programmatic – are organised and link to populations within a political body.
More Info
An MRI scanning machine

Bridging the gap: Negotiating health access in Bahia, Brazil

Can four rival mayors overcome politics, competing interests, and scarce resources to transform healthcare in Bahia, Brazil? For years, the region has struggled to provide medium-complexity care. To address this, the state has introduced regional polyclinics managed by voluntary consortia of mayors and the state government. In this multi-issue, multi-party negotiation role-play, four municipalities and the state must decide whether to form a consortium. Success could improve health outcomes, but contrasting politics, priorities, and resources could stand in the way.

Can four rival mayors overcome politics, competing interests, and scarce resources to transform healthcare in Bahia, Brazil? This multi-issue, multi-party negotiation role-play puts participants into the heart of one Brazilian state’s ambitious health regionalisation agenda. For years, medium-complexity care such as CT scans and specialist consultations had been concentrated in the state capital, creating deep disparities in access, with rural patients often delaying or missing vital care. To close this gap, the state introduced regional polyclinics managed by consortia of mayors and the state government. Participation, however, is completely voluntary, and a few regions have yet to join.

This simulation focuses on one of these regions, Ventura. In Ventura (fictionalised for teaching purposes), four municipalities must decide if they will at last form a consortium, and, if so, what health services to offer. Participants role-play as mayors and state representatives negotiating the terms of the collaboration. The stakes are high: success promises improved health outcomes and potentially reduced costs for the region, but, with politics, priorities, and resources varying widely between municipalities, each party is striving to achieve the best outcome for their own constituents.

Length of Teaching:
3-4 hours
Learning Objectives:
  • Practice and reflect upon key negotiation moves and skills;
  • Identify and balance social and political value in a complex public-sector negotiation;
  • Manage the tension between achieving a shared common goal and competing individual interests; and
  • Navigate a highly technical negotiation while maintain focus on strategic objectives.
More Info
A close up of hand and an exam paper of the Basic Education Certificate Examinations in Ghana.

Lessons of language: selecting a medium of instruction for Ghana’s primary schools

In 2018, Minister of Education Matthew Prempeh was reconsidering the language of instruction (LOI) policy for primary schools in Ghana, a country with more than 80 local languages and English as the national language. Prempeh saw many challenges to implementing the current LOI policy, where Grades 1 through 3 were taught in one of 11 select Ghanaian languages, and Grade 4 onwards taught in English. He considered the options: what LOI policy would best prepare students for a global society?

In 2018, Ghana’s Minister of Education Matthew Prempeh was reconsidering the language of instruction (LOI) policy for primary schools. In a country with more than 80 local languages yet a national language of English, the LOI policy stated that Grades 1 through 3 should be taught in one of 11 select Ghanaian languages, with Grade 4 onwards taught in English. While international evidence showed that students learnt critical skills best when taught in their first language, Prempeh saw many implementation challenges to the existing LOI policy, such as providing teaching materials in the 11 different languages. Moreover, Prempeh viewed English as a global language that could unlock opportunities. Should he improve the implementation of the current LOI policy, introduce English earlier, or move to English-only instruction altogether?

Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Examine how demands of utility can or should be balanced against concerns over socio-cultural wellbeing;
  2. Consider policy options that ensure equality and improve education outcomes for children in a multilingual country;
  3. Explore approaches for designing enduring policy reform
More Info
The fence of a construction site in Kiev painted in the colours of the Ukranian flag

Survival and security in Ukraine

It is January 2025, and Ukraine is facing a military threat to its survival from Russia. While a stalemate has fallen on the battlefield, the political landscape is shifting. A new US administration has entered office with a dramatically different policy towards Ukraine, potentially forcing Ukraine to reconsider what peace might mean. In this new geopolitical world, how could Ukraine best ensure security in the short- and long-term?

It is January 2025, and Ukraine is facing a military threat to its survival from Russia. Almost three years have passed since Russia had marched on Kyiv and more than 10 years since Russia occupied Crimea. While a stalemate has fallen on the battlefield, the political landscape is shifting. For years, the Russian government has been demanding that Ukraine give up claims to the Russian-occupied regions, and recognise them as part of Russia, as well as halting any attempt to join NATO – demands which have long been rejected by Ukrainians. Yet, the war has taken a heavy toll on Ukraine and a new US administration has entered office with a dramatic shift in policy towards Ukraine, potentially forcing Ukraine to reconsider its position. With it seeming increasingly likely that Ukraine will soon be handed terms of a ceasefire agreed between Russia and US, how could the country ensure that it responded in such a way that would best protect its security in short- and long-term? 

In this case study, participants consider how to prepare President Zelenskyy for a potential ceasefire deal over a 90-minute discussion-based class.

Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Understand ‘the anarchy problem’ in international relations and analyse the forms of political order at the global level that have emerged in response to anarchy;
  2. Recognise the ‘security dilemma’ that states face as a result of the anarchy problem and consider the various responses they have developed to avoid armed conflict and further global security;
  3. Apply theories around international relations and security to a specific context and weigh up strategies to further national security aims within that context.
More Info
A close up of a circuit board

Chips and chokepoints: export controls for Japan's semiconductor industry

In the 2020s, Japan was making major investments in its semiconductor industry as tensions grew between the US, its major security ally, and China, its largest economic partner. Washington pressured Tokyo to align with US export controls intended to prevent China from accessing advanced chips and the equipment needed to make them. Tokyo, worried about losing access to the Chinese market and potential economic retaliation, had to weigh up the risks of tightening its export controls or resisting US pressure.

In the 2020s, the Japanese government was taking major steps to revitalise its semiconductor industry. But this renewed investment came amidst a changing geopolitical landscape, marked by growing tensions between the US, Japan’s major security ally, and China, Japan’s largest economic partner. Alleging that China was using advanced US chips to modernise its military, the US implemented wide-sweeping export controls to prevent China from accessing advanced chips and the equipment needed to make them. The US wanted Japan to align with its export controls to make them more effective and, after nearly a year of talks, Japan introduced a limited set of export controls in 2023, though it did not name China as the target. China responded by circumventing restrictions and redoubling efforts to build domestic capacity.

Then, in late 2024, the US pressured Japan to tighten restrictions even further, including for some equipment and chemicals of which Japan was the leading producer. Japan worried about the potential impact on Japanese businesses, as well as retaliation from China, and had to weigh up the short-term and long-term consequences of tightening restrictions or resisting US pressure.

Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Examine how governments manage the opportunities and vulnerabilities of economic interdependence
  2. Deepen understanding of economic security, including concepts such as weaponised interdependence and state-business relations
More Info
A teacher in front of a blackboard in Rwanda

Enough already? Implementing evidence-based policy in the Rwandan education sector

Bernard Bahati, a director general in Rwanda's education ministry, was leading a task force considering ways to reform teachers’ contracts to tackle the country’s learning crisis. An adaptive trial was underway to see if the significant learning gains from the pilot could be replicated at scale when implemented by the government. However, six months into the trial, a new minister arrived wanting to scale-up immediately. Caught between political pressure to act quickly and researchers urging caution, Bahati faced a critical decision.

By the 2020s, Rwanda faced a learning crisis: while almost all children were in school, learning outcomes remained poor. Determined to improve education quality, the government had prioritised education in its national budget. Now, the Ministry of Education was under pressure to deliver. For the past year, Dr. Bernard Bahati, a director general in the ministry, had led a task force to reform teachers’ performance contracts and explore whether incentives could be linked directly to student learning. The team launched an adaptive trial of a promising pay-for-performance model, previously successful in a smaller pilot, to test its effectiveness at scale.

However, six months into the trial, a new minister was appointed. Although some early signs were encouraging, the results were still preliminary, with no statistically significant gains in learning – and implementation had proven difficult. Despite these concerns, the new minister, eager to address the crisis, pushed to roll out the performance contracts nationwide within the year. Caught between political pressure to act quickly and researchers urging caution, Bahati faced a critical decision: whether to scale an unproven program in hopes of immediate impact, or to delay and risk losing momentum and political support.

Authors:
Leodomir Mfura
Andrew Zeitlin
Length of Teaching:
1–2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Evaluate a body of evidence and explore the trade-offs involved in designing and implementing evidence-based policy;
  2. Identify key stakeholders and consider how they may view these trade-offs differently;
  3. Understand the concept of the ‘voltage drop’ in moving from a seemingly successful ‘proof of concept’ to an effective policy implemented at scale using government systems and consider ways to mitigate this through A/B testing;
  4. Exercise the use of judgement in balancing the ‘politics, logistics, and statistics’  involved in evidence-based policy-making;
  5. Understand the concept of the learning crisis, explore reasons for this crisis; and consider evidence-based options for addressing this crisis.
More Info
Covid vaccine bottles

Can the WTO help solve the COVID-19 vaccine crisis?

It is July 2021, and, in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, access to vaccines is highly uneven around the globe. In this multi-issue, multi-party negotiation role play, participants representing governments from the Global North and Global South, as well as pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers, must work together to solve this issue. And although all parties share a common interest in seeing vaccination rates rise globally, individual and national interests diverge and finding an agreement is extremely challenging.

It is July 2021 and more than four million people across the world have lost their lives to Covid-19. With the pandemic still raging, mass vaccination programmes have been rolled out in many countries as one essential strategy to combat the virus. However, access to vaccines is highly uneven around the globe: while rich countries have vaccinated large proportions of their populations, some low-income countries have vaccination rates of under 1%. 

In this multi-issue, multi-party negotiation role play, participants representing governments from the Global North, governments from the Global South, and pharmaceutical companies and manufacturers must work together to improve access to vaccinations. And although all parties share a common interest in seeing vaccination rates rise globally, individual and national interests diverge and finding an agreement on the best route to achieve the desired goal is extremely challenging. In the negotiation, participants must navigate shifting alliances and competing interests and must, fundamentally, develop an understanding of how to negotiate for the public good.

Authors:
Sachin Sathyarajan
Hayley Pring
Length of Teaching:
3-4 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Practice and reflect upon key negotiation moves, skills and potential obstacles in a multi-party, multi-issue complex negotiation;
  2. Explore and experience themes related to negotiating in the public interest.
More Info
Stay up to date

Follow our updates on the School's blog or subscribe to our mailing list.

Blog

Read about recent case studies on our blog.

Mailing list

Sign up to our mailing list to keep up to date with the latest information on workshops and resources.

Email us

Contact us directly