Teaching

Case Centre resources

Our resources

Our resources thrust participants into the heart of real-world scenarios, from crisis management in the UK during the Covid-19 pandemic to cross-party education reform in Brazil.

Many of our resources are available on The Case Centre distribution platform. Educators who are registered with the site can access free review copies of our case studies, teaching notes, and other materials.

To inquire about our other cases or background materials, please contact us at casecentre@bsg.ox.ac.uk.

Filters
A satellite image of the Red Sea

FSO Safer: negotiating to avoid disaster

Due to the ongoing civil war between Ansar Allah (the Houthis) and the Saudi-backed, internationally recognised government of Yemen, the tanker FSO Safer sat rusting and unmaintained off the coast of Yemen in 2022. With the hull deteriorating, a spill of 1.1 million barrels of oil was imminent. Although the catastrophe was preventable from a technical perspective, political barriers had restricted progress for years. In this multi-issue, multi-party negotiation participants are tasked with finding a way to avoid disaster.

Off the coast of Yemen, in the Red Sea, an enormous oil tanker sat rusting in 2022. The Floating Storage and Offloading Unit (FSO) Safer contained 1.1 million barrels of oil. However, due to the ongoing Yemen civil war between Ansar Allah (also known as the Houthis) and the Saudi-backed, internationally recognised government of Yemen, the tanker had not been maintained since 2015. With the rotting hull deteriorating every day, an oil spill from the Safer was widely considered both inevitable and imminent unless prompt action is taken. The consequences of such a spill would be dire: devastating the ecology of the Red Sea region, disrupting global trade by potentially blocking the Suez Canal for months, and greatly exacerbating the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Yemen. Although the disaster seemed relatively easy to prevent from a technical perspective, political barriers had restricted progress for years and talks between Ansar Allah and the UN broke down completely in 2019. This multi-issue, multi-party negotiation simulation for groups of 6-12 players picks up the story in early 2022 when a change of UN leadership, as well as other developments in the region, had opened the door for new negotiations.

Length of Teaching:
3-4 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Practice and reflect upon key negotiation moves, skills and potential obstacles in a multi-party, multi-issue complex negotiation;
  2. Explore and experience themes related to negotiating in a high-stakes, public-sector setting across conflict lines.
More Info
Close up of someone signing a contract

Sign here: politics and integrity in public administration

When Jay Adan, the most senior civil servant in his state’s Ministry of Internal Affairs, discovered irregularities in the selection of candidates for posts in his ministry, he suspected the minister may have interfered for his own political gain. Should Adan compromise his values by approving a corrupt process or risk his career and the valuable work he was doing by explicitly rejecting the list?

As the senior most civil servant in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Mountain State, Jay Adan was required to approve any new recruits hired in the interior ministry. When he received a list of candidates recommended for vacant posts in the Mountain State Emergency Services, one of his ministry’s departments, he suspected that the recruitment had not been meritocratic. His personal investigation suggested that the candidates chosen were unqualified, and that more candidates were being recruited than the number of actual vacancies. Patronage was a rampant issue in the region, and political leaders frequently used recruitment cycles to garner support among voters before elections. Adan believed it was likely that the minister of internal affairs was interfering with the recruitment to recommend individuals from his key constituencies in time for elections. Adan considered it unethical to approve a corrupt process, but explicitly rejecting the list could cost him his career and jeopardise the important projects he was working on. Running out of time and options, Adan needed to decide what to do.

Length of Teaching:
1-2 hours
Learning Objectives:
  1. Understand and explore different moral frameworks with which to approach a dilemma of institutional integrity;
  2. Consider various strategies for responding to a corrupt request in public service and the compromises each may entail;
  3. Develop an understanding of one's own values as they relate to public sector leadership.
More Info
PACIFIC OCEAN (March 18, 2009) Ensign Allan Aw and Republic of Korea Navy Ensign Do-Hee Jung conduct communications between the guided-missile destroyer USS John S. McCain (DDG 56) and the Republic of Korea Navy oiler Hwachon (AOE 59) during an underway replenishment. McCain, one of seven Arleigh Burke-class destroyers assigned to Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 15, is underway supporting Exercise Foal Eagle 09, a joint exercise between the U.S. and Republic of Korea naval services. (U.S. Navy photo)

Red alert: North Korea crisis simulation

The North Korean regime is among the most acute potential sources of global instability today, affecting and shaping complex regional dynamics in East Asia. In this 1.5-day exercise, participants conduct a crisis simulation centred around a fictional crisis scenario emerging in North Korea. Participants are divided into six teams, representing China, Japan, North Korea, Russia, South Korea and the United States. Each team must pursue its own national policy objectives, and each participant has a specific role within their team.

On 14 April 2023, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea announced that it had tested its ‘most powerful’ missile to date. A breakthrough in its weapons technology, the new solid-fuel ballistic missile was designed for rapid deployment – leaving little time to be intercepted by an adversary. Experts believed it had long-range or even intercontinental capabilities. With the launch, North Korea’s Supreme Leader Kim Jung Un sent a warning: ‘We will strike with deadly force and respond aggressively until the enemy gives up its idle strategy and foolish behaviour and so that it will suffer in endless fear.’ Just weeks earlier, two of North Korea’s stated enemies, the United States and Republic of Korea , conducted the largest joint military exercises in South Korea in five years. The two militaries maintained that the drills were routine and defensive, a response to North Korean ‘aggression’. But North Korea’s state media viewed them as moves of ‘frantic war preparation’. Tensions were ratcheting up in an already volatile region.

This dynamic crisis simulation picks up when communication between North and South Korea breaks down following North Korea’s missile tests. Groups of six to nine participants are allocated roles in the governments of North Korea, Republic of Korea, China, USA, Japan, and Russia to solve an escalating international crisis consisting of military, health, and economic emergencies. Over the course of five phases, participants must take actions according to their roles and their allocated country’s interests.

Length of Teaching:
2 days
Learning Objectives:
  1. Develop the skills of working in a team in a high-pressure, high-stakes context;
  2. Understand the utility and limitations of different levers of national power;
  3. Analyse the stability challenges posed by the DPRK;
  4. Explore the dynamics of the China-US relationship.
More Info
Stay up to date

Follow our updates on the School's blog or subscribe to our mailing list.

Blog

Read about recent case studies on our blog.

Mailing list

Sign up to our mailing list to keep up to date with the latest information on workshops and resources.

Email us

Contact us directly