As the COVID-19 pandemic lingers, the possibility of ‘pandemic fatigue’ has raised worldwide concerns. Anna Petherick and Rafael Goldszmidt, alongside Thomas Hale, Eduardo B. Andrade, Rodrigo Furst, Annalena Pott and Andrew Wood, have published an analysis of changing levels of protective-behaviour observance in Nature Human Behaviour.
The authors examine whether there was a gradual reduction in adherence to protective behaviours against COVID-19 from March through December 2020, as hypothesised in expectations of fatigue.
Using multi-level models including mobile-phone mobility dataset, and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), the authors considered self-report behaviours from representative samples of the populations of 14 countries as well as mobility and policy data for 124 countries.
The results show that changes in adherence were empirically meaningful and geographically widespread. While a low-cost and habituating behaviour (mask wearing) exhibited a linear rise in adherence, high-cost and sensitising behaviours (physical distancing) declined, but this decline decelerated over time, with small rebounds seen in later months. Reductions in adherence to physical distancing showed little difference across societal groups, but were less intense in countries with high interpersonal trust. Alternative underlying mechanisms and policy implications are discussed.
- See the full paper on Nature Human Behaviour.
- A view-only version is available here.
- Anna Petherick has also written a 'Behind the paper' blog for Nature Behavioural and Social Sciences.
Recent research updates
Journal article on measuring digital inclusion
Focusing on the internet as a foundational technology, this paper sets out a framework of core components of digital inclusion—including access/use, quality of access/use, affordability, and digital skills. The paper then surveys the ways these components are currently measured in household and firm surveys and by international organisations.
Partnership with UN on new tool to mitigate the impacts of armed conflict
An eight year partnership between the UN System Staff College (UNSSC) and an Oxford University team, led by Dr Annette Idler, has produced a new conflict analysis tool aiming to aid the understanding, tracing, and forecasting of changes in conflicts across the world.
New paper by Janina Dill suggests Ukrainians oppose Russian control and territorial concessions, regardless of the costs
‘At Any Cost: How Ukrainians Think about Self-Defense Against Russia’, published in the American Journal of Political Science, analyses a survey of 1,160 Ukrainians in July 2022.